Miller v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc., 4:19-CV-01550. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20191202507
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . On November 8, 2019, U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 26) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Brief in Support (Dkt. 12) be granted. No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the recor
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . On November 8, 2019, U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 26) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Brief in Support (Dkt. 12) be granted. No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., District Judge.
On November 8, 2019, U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 26) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Brief in Support (Dkt. 12) be granted.
No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Brief in Support (Dkt. 12) is GRANTED, and this case is compelled to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Employment Arbitration Policy.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED and ENTERED.
Source: Leagle
