Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carter v. City of Philadelphia, 98-1581 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 98-1581 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 14, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-14-1999 Carter v. City of Philadelphia Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-1581 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999 Recommended Citation "Carter v. City of Philadelphia" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 127. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/127 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the
More
Opinions of the United 1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-14-1999 Carter v. City of Philadelphia Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-1581 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999 Recommended Citation "Carter v. City of Philadelphia" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 127. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/127 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 98-1581 Re: Carter v. City of Philadelphia, et al. The following modifications have been made to the Court's Opinion issued on April 28, 1999 and to the prior corrections noted in the above-entitled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: Page 31, n.61, add the following sentence at the end: "To the extent that Carter's claims are predicated on inadequate training, supervision or discipline of police officers (as opposed to assistant district attorneys), Carter will be required to establish sufficient de jure or de facto control by the defendants to supporting a finding of causation. In the prior corrections "de jure" had been incorrectly spelled due to a typographic error. Very truly yours, /s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk Dated: May 14, 1999
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer