Opinions of the United 1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-17-1999 Durham Life Ins Co v. Evans Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 97-1683,97-1712 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999 Recommended Citation "Durham Life Ins Co v. Evans" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 40. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/40 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. Filed February 17, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NOS. 97-1683 and 97-1712 DURHAM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DIANNE EVANS, Appellant in No. 97-1712 (E.D. Pa. No. 94-cv-00801) DIANNE EVANS v. PEOPLES SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (E.D. Pa. No. 95-cv-02681) Durham Life Insurance Company and Peoples Security Life Insurance Company, Appellants in No. 97-1683 On Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Argued: September 24, 1998 Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges. (Opinion Filed January 15, 1999) ORDER AMENDING OPINION The slip opinion in the above case filed on January 15, 1999 is hereby amended as follows: 1. On page 25, second paragraph of Part IVA, add a new footnote (#11) after the sentence ending with "adverse employment action" which should read as follows: We do not establish a blanket rule that any constructive discharge is a tangible adverse employment action. We merely hold that, in this instance, the tangible adverse actions that Evans suffered would foreseeably have led a reasonable person to resign. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward R. Becker Chief Judge DATED: 17 February 1999 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2