Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pollice v. Natl Tax Funding, 99-3856 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 99-3856 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 08, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-8-2000 Pollice v. Natl Tax Funding Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 99-3856 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "Pollice v. Natl Tax Funding" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 190. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/190 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United
More
Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-8-2000 Pollice v. Natl Tax Funding Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 99-3856 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "Pollice v. Natl Tax Funding" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 190. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/190 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2000 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 99-3856, 99-3857, 99-4049, 99-3858, 99-3859 and 99-3998 TITO POLLICE; VIOLET POLLICE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; LINDA MANSFIELD, Appellants in No. 99-3856 v. NATIONAL TAX FUNDING, L.P.; CAPITAL ASSET RESEARCH CORPORATION, LTD. TITO POLLICE; VIOLET POLLICE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; LINDA MANSFIELD, v. NATIONAL TAX FUNDING, L.P.; CAPITAL ASSET RESEARCH CORPORATION, LTD. Appellants in No. 99-3857 TITO POLLICE; VIOLET POLLICE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; LINDA MANSFIELD, Appellants in No. 99-4049 v. NATIONAL TAX FUNDING, L.P.; CAPITAL ASSET RESEARCH CORPORATION, LTD. GLADYS HOUCK; MARIE DEMITRAS; BRAGETTE PARKER; MARY WALSH, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARY TABB, Appellants in No. 99-3858 v. CAPITAL ASSET RESEARCH CORP., LTD.; NATIONAL TAX FUNDING, L.P.; CAPITAL ASSET HOLDINGS GP INC. GLADYS HOUCK; MARIE DEMITRAS; BRAGETTE PARKER; MARY WALSH, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARY TABB, v. CAPITAL ASSET RESEARCH CORP., LTD.; NATIONAL TAX FUNDING, L.P.; CAPITAL ASSET HOLDINGS GP INC. Appellants in No. 99-3859 GLADYS HOUCK; MARIE DEMITRAS; BRAGETTE PARKER; MARY WALSH, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARY TABB, Appellants in No. 99-3998 v. CAPITAL ASSET RESEARCH CORP., LTD.; NATIONAL TAX FUNDING, L.P.; CAPITAL ASSET HOLDINGS GP INC. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. Nos. 98-00813 and 98-00850) PRESENT: GREENBERG, Circuit Judge ORDER It is ordered that the slip opinion filed in this case on August 29, 2000, is amended to the end that the word "forebear" which is the third word in the fifth line from the end of the complete paragraph on page 21 shall be "forbear." By the Court, /s/ Morton I. Greenberg Circuit Judge DATED: September 7, 2000
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer