Filed: Jun. 13, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-13-2000 United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-3578 & 983579 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "United States v. One Toshiba Color Television" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 128. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/128 This decision is brought to you for free
Summary: Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-13-2000 United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-3578 & 983579 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "United States v. One Toshiba Color Television" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 128. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/128 This decision is brought to you for free a..
More
Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-13-2000 United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-3578 & 983579 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "United States v. One Toshiba Color Television" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 128. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/128 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2000 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 98-3578 & 98-3579 United States v. One Toshiba Color Television, et al. The following modifications have been made to the Court's Opinion issued on May 24, 2000, to the above-entitled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: 1. On page 5, line 5, Proc. should be P. 2. On page 6, second full paragraph, line 4, Proc. should be P. 3. On page 9, fourth line from the bottom, Serv. should be Servs. 4. On page 10, first full paragraph, line 13, change Bd. to Board. 5. Change vis-a-vis to vis-…-vis -- on page 12, first full paragraph, line 10; and on page 17 in footnote 6. 6. On page 13, in footnote 3, line 1, change Prof. to Professional. 7. Change Proc. to P. -- on page 15, second full paragraph, line 6; on page 16, line 1 and the third line from the bottom of page 16; and on page 17, first full paragraph line 7. 8. On page 16, line 9, change the period to a comma and make See lower case. 9. On page 17, first full paragraph, line 14, change Louisiana to La. 10. On page 20, line 3, add "see also before the cite Ikelionwu v. United States. 11. On page 22, third line from the bottom, delete the quotation mark. Very truly yours, /s/ MARCIA M. WALDRON, Acting Clerk Dated: June 13, 2000