BAKER v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, 3-13-0657. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20130904d39
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10), Motion to Strike (Docket No. 16), and Motion to Stay (Docket No. 24). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is GRANTED, and all claims against Defendant Hall individually are DISMISSED. Defendant Hall's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 16) is DENIED, and Defendant Hall's Motion to Stay (Docket No. 24) is DENIED
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10), Motion to Strike (Docket No. 16), and Motion to Stay (Docket No. 24). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is GRANTED, and all claims against Defendant Hall individually are DISMISSED. Defendant Hall's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 16) is DENIED, and Defendant Hall's Motion to Stay (Docket No. 24) is DENIED ..
More
ORDER
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10), Motion to Strike (Docket No. 16), and Motion to Stay (Docket No. 24). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is GRANTED, and all claims against Defendant Hall individually are DISMISSED.
Defendant Hall's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 16) is DENIED, and Defendant Hall's Motion to Stay (Docket No. 24) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle