Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Campbell v. Vaughn, 98-1744 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 98-1744 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-12-2000 Campbell v. Vaughn Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-1744 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "Campbell v. Vaughn" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 77. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/77 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of App
More
Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-12-2000 Campbell v. Vaughn Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-1744 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "Campbell v. Vaughn" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 77. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/77 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2000 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. Filed April 12, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NO. 98-1744 DEAN NATHAN CAMPBELL, Appellant v. DONALD T. VAUGHN; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA On Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 97-cv-02677) District Judge: Honorable John P. Fullam Argued: January 10, 2000 Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, ALITO and BARRY, Circuit Judges. (Opinion Filed April 7, 2000) ORDER The Opinion in the above case filed April 7, 2000 is hereby VACATED. The vacatur is necessary because of a word-processing or transmission error, which resulted in text being omitted from the opinion as printed. The opinion as originally filed will be vacated and the corrected opinion substituted. The time for filing a petition for rehearing will run from the date of the corrected opinion. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward R. Becker ___________________________ Chief Judge DATED: April 12, 2000 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer