Gilmour v. Humana Health Plan of Texas, Inc., 3:17-CV-00179. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180629b09
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Andrew Edison. On May 2, 2018, this Court referred Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to Judge Edison (Dkt. 32). On May 18, 2018, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be denied (Dkt. 35). No objections have been filed to the Memorandum
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Andrew Edison. On May 2, 2018, this Court referred Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to Judge Edison (Dkt. 32). On May 18, 2018, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be denied (Dkt. 35). No objections have been filed to the Memorandum a..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Andrew Edison. On May 2, 2018, this Court referred Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to Judge Edison (Dkt. 32). On May 18, 2018, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be denied (Dkt. 35).
No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED.R.CIV.P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18) is DENIED;
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
