Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USA Ex Rel Merena v. Smithkline Beecham, 98-1497 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 98-1497 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 29, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-29-2000 USA Ex Rel Merena v. Smithkline Beecham Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-1497 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "USA Ex Rel Merena v. Smithkline Beecham" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 40. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/40 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the
More
Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-29-2000 USA Ex Rel Merena v. Smithkline Beecham Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-1497 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "USA Ex Rel Merena v. Smithkline Beecham" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 40. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/40 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2000 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. Filed April 21, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 98-1497 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. ROBERT J. MERENA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION United States of America, Appellant No. 98-1498 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. KEVIN J. SPEAR; THE BERKELEY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER; JACK DOWDEN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. United States of America, Appellant No. 98-1499 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. GLENN GROSSENBACHER; CHARLES W. ROBINSON, JR. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. United States of America, Appellant ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (Dist. Ct. No. 93--cv--5974) District Judge: The Honorable Donald W. VanArtsdalen Argued: March 5, 1999 Before: ALITO, McKEE, AND GARWOOD,* Circuit Judges (Opinion Filed: February 29, 2000) ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION The slip opinion in this case is amended as follows: 1. In the first sentence of Part IA of the opinion, the phrase "had adopted a scheme" is amended to read "had adopted the following scheme." 2. In the second sentence of Part IA of the opinion, the words "Specifically, the government suspected that" are deleted and the word "the" preceding the word "laboratories" is capitalized. 3. The paragraph indentation between the second and third sentences of Part IA of the opinion is eliminated. BY THE COURT: Samuel A. Alito Circuit Judge _________________________________________________________________ * The Honorable Will L. Garwood, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer