Filed: Feb. 10, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-10-2000 Suppan v. Dadonna Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-2129 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "Suppan v. Dadonna" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 26. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/26 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appea
Summary: Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-10-2000 Suppan v. Dadonna Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-2129 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "Suppan v. Dadonna" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 26. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/26 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeal..
More
Opinions of the United 2000 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-10-2000 Suppan v. Dadonna Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-2129 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000 Recommended Citation "Suppan v. Dadonna" (2000). 2000 Decisions. Paper 26. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2000/26 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2000 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 98-2129 Suppan v. Dadonna The following modifications have been made to the Court's Opinion issued on 4 February 2000 , to the above-entitled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: 1. Page 4, second line from the bottom - "twenty-eight" should be "twenty- eighth". 2. Page 5, last paragraph, second line - "Sergeants" should be "sergeants". 3. Page 6, line 2 - "one half" should be "one-half". 4. Page 6, first paragraph under heading II, second line - "list" should be "lists". 5. Page 6, first paragraph under heading II, fourth line - "claim" should be "claims". 6. Page 7, line 1 - "list" should be "lists". 7. Page 7, line 14 - "claim" should be "claims". 8. Page 7, line 16 - "claim" should be "claims". 9. Page 11, line 7 - "list" should be "lists". 10. Page 11, second paragraph, line 2 - insert a comma after the citation and before the word "appropriate". 11. Page 12, first paragraph under heading V, line 3, "list" should be "lists" and "was" should be "were". 12. Page 14, second line from bottom - "list" should be "lists". 13. Page 17, footnote 6, third line from bottom - "list" should be "lists". Very truly yours, /s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk Dated: 10 February 2000
