Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Laday v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 1:17-CV-00218. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20180925h58 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RON CLARK , Senior District Judge . The Plaintiff requests judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration with respect to his application for disability-based benefits. This matter has been referred to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge submitted
More

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Plaintiff requests judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration with respect to his application for disability-based benefits. This matter has been referred to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge submitted a report recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. The court has considered the report and recommendation filed on August 20, 2018 (Doc. No. 12) and the Plaintiff's objections. (Doc. No. 13.) The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes that the Plaintiff's objections are without merit.1 The court concludes that the magistrate judge correctly identified and discussed the points of error argued by plaintiff and analyzed those points correctly. The magistrate judge properly examined the entire record to determine that substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge's determination decision and the Commissioner's denial of benefits.

Accordingly, all of the Plaintiffs objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

So Ordered and Signed.

FootNotes


1. The Plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation fail to recognize the split in decisions that recognize the language used by the ALJ complies with the legal standard set forth by the Fifth Circuit to evaluate severe impairments, which was properly discussed and considered by the Magistrate Judge. The ALJ and Magistrate Judge applied the correct standard in assessing Laday's impairments and ability to perform work related activities. The ALJ sets out the proper legal standard of disability under the Act in his decision and the agency's five step sequential evaluation process for evaluating disability under the Act.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer