Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hodge, 00-3296 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 00-3296 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2001 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-12-2001 United States v. Hodge Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 00-3296 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001 Recommended Citation "United States v. Hodge" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 127. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/127 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Co
More
Opinions of the United 2001 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-12-2001 United States v. Hodge Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 00-3296 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001 Recommended Citation "United States v. Hodge" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 127. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/127 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2001 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 00-3296 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. ALEX HODGE ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS (Dist. Court No. Crim. 1999/66) District Court Judge: Raymond L. Finch Argued on December 7, 2000 Before: MANSMANN and ALITO, Circuit Judges, and FULLAM, Senior District Judge. ORDER AMENDING OPINION The opinion filed on April 5, 2001 is amended as follows: In the list of counsel for appellant on page 2, "(Argued)" should be deleted after the name of Denise A. Hinds and added after the name of Michael A. Rotker. "Civil Division" should be replaced by "Criminal Division" in the entry for Michael A. Rotker. And the entry for Michael A. Rotker should be placed at the top of the list of attorneys for the appellant, while the entry for Denise A. Hinds should be placed at the bottom of the list, following the entry for Marc Osborne. The revised list of counsel for appellant should then read as follows: MICHAEL A. ROTKER (Argued) United States Department of Justice Criminal Division 601 D Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 LOUIS M. FISCHER United States Department of Justice Criminal Division P.O. Box 899 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0899 MARC OSBORNE United States Department of Justice 601 D Street, N.W., Suite 6111 Washington, DC 20530 DENISE A. HINDS Office of the United States Attorney 1108 King Street, Suite 201 Christiansted, St. Croix United States Virgin Islands 00802 Counsel for Appellant BY THE COURT: /s/Samuel A. Alito Circuit Judge DATED: June 12, 2001
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer