Archibald v. Virginia Transformer Corp., 3:17-CV-00286. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190320g86
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . On June 1, 2018, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. Dkt. 23. On February 26, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Dkt. 41. No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. , District Judge . On June 1, 2018, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. Dkt. 23. On February 26, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Dkt. 41. No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., District Judge.
On June 1, 2018, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. Dkt. 23. On February 26, 2019, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Dkt. 41.
No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 32) is GRANTED.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
