Prescott v. Denton County Jail, 4:16cv879. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180925h62
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE INITIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson. The Initial Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE INITIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson. The Initial Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of j..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE INITIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
AMOS L. MAZZANT, District Judge.
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson. The Initial Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, has been presented for consideration. No objections have been filed. After reviewing the Report, the Court concludes the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is accordingly ORDERED Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 22) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
