Anderson v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution, 2:17-CV-00102. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20171218b19
Visitors: 34
Filed: Dec. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On October 26, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be dismissed. (ECF No. 10.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) i
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On October 26, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be dismissed. (ECF No. 10.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
On October 26, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. (ECF No. 10.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.
Petitioner has failed his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
