U.S. v. PRIVOTT, 12-6557. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120531197
Visitors: 23
Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ryan Devon Privott appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Privott, No. 2:03-cr-00172-AWA-FBS-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 12, 2012 & entered Mar. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ryan Devon Privott appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Privott, No. 2:03-cr-00172-AWA-FBS-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 12, 2012 & entered Mar. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and l..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Devon Privott appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Privott, No. 2:03-cr-00172-AWA-FBS-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 12, 2012 & entered Mar. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
