CARTY v. SCARBERRY, 7:13CV00234. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia
Number: infdco20140804665
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES P. JONES, District Judge. Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Pamela Meade Sargent, United States Magistrate Judge, filed on July 11, —. Upon de novo review by this court of the portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 87) are OVERULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 86) is fully ACCEPTED; 3. Plaintiff's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No
Summary: ORDER JAMES P. JONES, District Judge. Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Pamela Meade Sargent, United States Magistrate Judge, filed on July 11, —. Upon de novo review by this court of the portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 87) are OVERULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 86) is fully ACCEPTED; 3. Plaintiff's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF Nos..
More
ORDER
JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Pamela Meade Sargent, United States Magistrate Judge, filed on July 11, —. Upon de novo review by this court of the portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 87) are OVERULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 86) is fully ACCEPTED;
3. Plaintiff's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 30, 78) are DENIED; and
4. Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 75) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
