Vanderbol v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 4:19-CV-119 (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190717f20
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On June 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #36) that pro se Plaintiffs John S. Vanderbol III and Erica Quinn (together, "Plaintiffs")
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On June 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #36) that pro se Plaintiffs John S. Vanderbol III and Erica Quinn (together, "Plaintiffs") ..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AMOS L. MAZZANT, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #36) that pro se Plaintiffs John S. Vanderbol III and Erica Quinn (together, "Plaintiffs") Motions for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the "Motions for Sanctions") (4:19-cv-119, Dkt. 26; 4:19-cv-120, Dkt. 27) be denied.
Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motions for Sanctions (4:19-cv-119, Dkt. 26; 4:19-cv-120, Dkt. 27) are hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
