OBO, INC. v. APACHE CORPORATION, 14-17-00170-CV. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20170502568
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 02, 2017
Latest Update: May 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . The clerk's record was filed April 25, 2017. Our review has determined that relevant items have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk's record on or before May 12, 2017, containing OBO, Inc.'s Consolidated Motion for New Trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(a)(6). If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a s
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . The clerk's record was filed April 25, 2017. Our review has determined that relevant items have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk's record on or before May 12, 2017, containing OBO, Inc.'s Consolidated Motion for New Trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(a)(6). If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a su..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The clerk's record was filed April 25, 2017. Our review has determined that relevant items have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk's record on or before May 12, 2017, containing OBO, Inc.'s Consolidated Motion for New Trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(a)(6).
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk's record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.
Source: Leagle
