U.S. v. VAN DOAN, 4:07cr185 (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20140320e03
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARCIA A. CRONE, District Judge. Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order, and having received Defendant's waiver of right to object and
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARCIA A. CRONE, District Judge. Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order, and having received Defendant's waiver of right to object and ..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARCIA A. CRONE, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order, and having received Defendant's waiver of right to object and waiver of right to be present and speak at sentencing, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore,
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. It is further
ORDERED that Defendant's supervised release is hereby REVOKED in both cases. It is further
ORDERED that Defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of eight (8) months with no supervised release to follow in Case No. 4:07cr185. It is further
ORDERED that Defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of eight (8) months with no supervised release to follow in Case No. 4:08cr117, to be served consecutively with the sentence of imprisonment imposed in Case. No. 4:07cr185. The Court recommends that Defendant be housed in the Bureau of Prisons, Big Spring Unit.
Source: Leagle
