ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 3:11-0806. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20120118874
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jan. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. On November 30, 2011, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Docket No. 34), recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 13) be denied because Plaintiff has failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that he has been deprived of adequate medical care, and has failed to show that the failure to issue an injunction will cause him irreparable harm. Despite being specifically
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. On November 30, 2011, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Docket No. 34), recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 13) be denied because Plaintiff has failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that he has been deprived of adequate medical care, and has failed to show that the failure to issue an injunction will cause him irreparable harm. Despite being specifically a..
More
ORDER
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
On November 30, 2011, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Docket No. 34), recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 13) be denied because Plaintiff has failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that he has been deprived of adequate medical care, and has failed to show that the failure to issue an injunction will cause him irreparable harm. Despite being specifically advised in the R & R that any objections to the R & R were to be filed within fourteen days, Plaintiff has filed no objections.
Having reviewed the matter in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accordingly,
(1) The R & R (Docket No. 34) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;
(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 13) is hereby DENIED; and
(3) This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial case management.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
