Schoch v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, 4:16-CV-619. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20171121g70
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On October 10, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #81) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #72)
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On October 10, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #81) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #72) ..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AMOS L. MAZZANT, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 10, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #81) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #72) be GRANTED.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Request for a Conference Meeting Regarding Procedures and Request for Banking Expert (Dkt. #84), wherein Plaintiff requests a call regarding "the procedures moving forward along with the request for Banking Expert" is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant's Motion to Stay or Continue Pre-Trial Deadlines (Dkt. #86) is likewise DENIED AS MOOT.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
