Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SONDESKY v. ISR GROUP, INC., 14-1077. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20140718b69 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND STAYING CASE J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (D.E. 13) of the magistrate judge, filed June 18, 2014, recommending that the May 29, 2014 motion (D.E. 11) of the Defendant, Alfred Lumpkin, seeking to stay this action pending resolution of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Defendant, ISR Group, Inc., be granted. According to the Court's docket, no objections to t
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND STAYING CASE

J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (D.E. 13) of the magistrate judge, filed June 18, 2014, recommending that the May 29, 2014 motion (D.E. 11) of the Defendant, Alfred Lumpkin, seeking to stay this action pending resolution of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Defendant, ISR Group, Inc., be granted. According to the Court's docket, no objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed, and the time for such objections has now expired.

The Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. No objections having been filed to the report and recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Lumpkin's motion to stay proceedings is GRANTED. The parties are DIRECTED to notify the Court within thirty days following the resolution of Defendant's bankruptcy petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer