STUCKE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 12-6216. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150513b73
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 12, 2015
Latest Update: May 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34), Plaintiff Roland Stucke's and Defendant's Statement of Stipulated Material Facts (Doc. 34-1), Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37), Defendant's Reply Memorandum in Support oflts Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40), and Plaintiffs Sur-Reply
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34), Plaintiff Roland Stucke's and Defendant's Statement of Stipulated Material Facts (Doc. 34-1), Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37), Defendant's Reply Memorandum in Support oflts Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40), and Plaintiffs Sur-Reply ..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34), Plaintiff Roland Stucke's and Defendant's Statement of Stipulated Material Facts (Doc. 34-1), Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37), Defendant's Reply Memorandum in Support oflts Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40), and Plaintiffs Sur-Reply in Further Support of His Response in Opposition (Doc. 45), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
