Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tyler v. Berryhill, 6:15-0770-MBS. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20180626e71 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARGARET B. SEYMOUR , Senior District Judge . On February 23, 2015, Plaintiff Dana Dukes Tyler brought this action to obtain judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On April 14, 2016, the court remanded the Commissioner's decision pursuant to sentence four of 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. By or
More

ORDER

On February 23, 2015, Plaintiff Dana Dukes Tyler brought this action to obtain judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On April 14, 2016, the court remanded the Commissioner's decision pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. By order entered July 19, 2016, the court awarded attorney's fees and expenses in the amount of $4,500.00 to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). By order filed April 11, 2018, the court granted attorney's fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $19,111.50.

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's second motion for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) filed June 6, 2018. Counsel moves for an order awarding an attorney's fee of $23,992.50 for work done only in this court. The fee is in addition to the previous award of $19,111.50.1 On June 20, 2018, the Commissioner filed a response informing the court that she has no objection to Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (ECF No. 40) is granted in the amount of $23,992.50.

The Commissioner informs the court that the EAJA fee was offset by the government to pay federal debt owed by Plaintiff, so that counsel did not receive reimbursement under the EAJA. Therefore, counsel is not required to remit any sums to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The fees do not exceed 25% of the past due benefits awarded to Plaintiff and his beneficiaries, in accordance with the fee agreement between Plaintiff and counsel and as permitted by 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). See ECF No. 40-3.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer