Filed: Aug. 30, 2002
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2017
Summary: Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-30-2002 Gao v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 01-3472 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002 Recommended Citation "Gao v. Atty Gen USA" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 546. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/546 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the Unite
Summary: Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-30-2002 Gao v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 01-3472 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002 Recommended Citation "Gao v. Atty Gen USA" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 546. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/546 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United..
More
Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-30-2002 Gao v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 01-3472 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002 Recommended Citation "Gao v. Atty Gen USA" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 546. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/546 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2002 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. PRECEDENTIAL Filed August 30, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 01-3472 CHEN YUN GAO, Petitioner v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board No. A 77 341 155) Argued: May 20, 2002 Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, GREENBERG, Circuit Judge, and BARZILAY, Judge, U.S. C ourt of International Trade.* (Opinion Filed: August 7, 2002) ORDER AMENDING OPINION The slip opinion in the above case filed August 7, 2002 is amended as follows: 1. On page 7, in footnote 2, section 3), the correct Semester should be 1st. 2. On page 8, first full paragraph, line 15, the word "bur" should be "but." _________________________________________________________________ *Honorable Judith M. Barzilay, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 3. On page 16, first full paragraph, line 1, the word "reports" should be "report." 4. On page 25, first full paragraph, line 3, add the word "in" after "engaging." BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward R. Becker Chief Judge DATED: August 30, 2002 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2