Bartlett v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 6:16cv1292. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180326c26
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the above-styled Social Security action be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further consideration. No written
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the above-styled Social Security action be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further consideration. No written ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RON CLARK, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the above-styled Social Security action be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration. No written objections have been filed. The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are, therefore, adopted as those of the Court. It is
ORDERED that the above-styled Social Security action is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings in the Report and Recommendation (ECF 17). It is further
ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
