SCOTT v. CITY OF NORFOLK, 11-2203. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120223147
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael A. Scott appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. City of Norfolk , No. 2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the m
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael A. Scott appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. City of Norfolk , No. 2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Scott appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
