U.S. v. ROBERTS, 15-6476. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150831129
Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Lucien Antonio Roberts appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Roberts , No. 4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Lucien Antonio Roberts appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Roberts , No. 4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and leg..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Lucien Antonio Roberts appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Roberts, No. 4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
