OWENS v. JEFFERSON, 10-7143. (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20101213109
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 13, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2010
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Curtis Q. Owens appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court's reasoning that Owens failed to properly exhaust available administrative remedies as to his claims of constitutional magnitude as required by 42 U.S.C.
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Curtis Q. Owens appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court's reasoning that Owens failed to properly exhaust available administrative remedies as to his claims of constitutional magnitude as required by 42 U.S.C. ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Q. Owens appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court's reasoning that Owens failed to properly exhaust available administrative remedies as to his claims of constitutional magnitude as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2006). Owens v. Jefferson, No. 0:09-cv-02888-TLW (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
