Filed: Jul. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JAMES P. JONES , District Judge . Defendant Amelia Turner, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a document entitled "Motion Requesting Time Served Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)." The motion will be denied. Turner pleaded guilty before this court, pursuant to a written Plea Agreement, to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute oxycodone and using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug traf
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JAMES P. JONES , District Judge . Defendant Amelia Turner, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a document entitled "Motion Requesting Time Served Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)." The motion will be denied. Turner pleaded guilty before this court, pursuant to a written Plea Agreement, to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute oxycodone and using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug traff..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.
Defendant Amelia Turner, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a document entitled "Motion Requesting Time Served Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)." The motion will be denied.
Turner pleaded guilty before this court, pursuant to a written Plea Agreement, to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute oxycodone and using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). I sentenced Turner to 135 months on the drug offense and 60 months on the firearm offense, to run consecutive to the drug sentence. Judgment was entered on October 28, 2009. Turner did not appeal.
In 2013 Turner submitted a motion which the court construed, with her consent, as a motion to vacate her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. I found that her motion was untimely and it was dismissed. Order, Apr. 29, 2013, ECF No. 86.
While Turner relies on § 3582(c)(1)(A) and also mentions the First Step Act of 2018, she alleges no facts that would allow the court to reduce her sentence under those provisions of law. She also contends that she was not guilty of her § 924(c) crime, but the court has no power to consider such an argument at this late date.
For these reasons, it is ORDERED that the defendant's motion, ECF No. 104, is DENIED.
