Furman v. Berryhill, 4:15-5066-RMG. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20180613h10
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. 406(b). (Dkt. No. 36). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for his services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $31,335.00, which represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. ( Id. ). Plaintiff's contract with his counsel provides for a 25% contingency fee. The Defendant has advised t
Summary: ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. 406(b). (Dkt. No. 36). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for his services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $31,335.00, which represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. ( Id. ). Plaintiff's contract with his counsel provides for a 25% contingency fee. The Defendant has advised th..
More
ORDER
RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. No. 36). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for his services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $31,335.00, which represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. (Id.). Plaintiff's contract with his counsel provides for a 25% contingency fee. The Defendant has advised the Court that she does not oppose approval of the attorney fee request of Plaintiff, but correctly notes that upon receipt of the fee award under § 406(b), Plaintiff's counsel is obligated to pay to her client the amount previously awarded by the Court under EAJA. (Dkt. No. 38).
The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's motion in light of the standards set forth in Grisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). The Court finds that pursuant to the Grisbrecht standards the proposed fee is reasonable and grants the Plaintiff's motion to approve the fee in the amount of $31,335.00. Upon receipt of this award, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to reimburse to Plaintiff $4,561.31 previously awarded under EAJA. (Dkt. No. 35).
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
