Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Knigge v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:18-cv-05283-BAT. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190128b79 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF REMAND BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA , Chief Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate that this case should be remanded for further proceedings. Dkt. 17. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to offer Plaintiff a hearing; obtain necessary medical expert evidence; further consider opinion evidence pursuant to 20 CFR 416.927; further consider Plaintiff's
More

ORDER OF REMAND

The parties stipulate that this case should be remanded for further proceedings. Dkt. 17. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to offer Plaintiff a hearing; obtain necessary medical expert evidence; further consider opinion evidence pursuant to 20 CFR § 416.927; further consider Plaintiff's subjective complaints pursuant to 20 CFR § 416.929 and Social Security Ruling 16-3p; further consider Plaintiff's residual functional capacity; obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence; and issue a new decision. Upon proper application, Plaintiff shall be eligible for attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2412 et seq.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer