JONES v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO., 1:11-CV-266. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20120724b89
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK, Judge. On May 26, 2011, this case was referred for all pretrial matters to the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines. On August 9, 2011, the case was reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. Pending is Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company's "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 53). The Court has received and considered the report (Docket No. 61) of the magistrate ju
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK, Judge. On May 26, 2011, this case was referred for all pretrial matters to the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines. On August 9, 2011, the case was reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. Pending is Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company's "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 53). The Court has received and considered the report (Docket No. 61) of the magistrate jud..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RON CLARK, Judge.
On May 26, 2011, this case was referred for all pretrial matters to the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines. On August 9, 2011, the case was reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. Pending is Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company's "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 53). The Court has received and considered the report (Docket No. 61) of the magistrate judge, who recommends that the motion should be granted and that the lawsuit should be dismissed with prejudice. No objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed. The Court's independent review confirms that the magistrate judge's analysis is correct.
It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (Docket No. 61) of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED, the "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Docket No. 53) is GRANTED, and this lawsuit is DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately.
Source: Leagle
