U.S. v. SANDOVAL, 4:13CR295.1. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20140404c78
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARCIA A. CRONE, Judge. Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this court having heretofore referred the request for revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The court has received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. Defendant having waived allocution before this court as well as his
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARCIA A. CRONE, Judge. Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this court having heretofore referred the request for revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The court has received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. Defendant having waived allocution before this court as well as his ..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARCIA A. CRONE, Judge.
Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this court having heretofore referred the request for revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The court has received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. Defendant having waived allocution before this court as well as his right to object to the report of the Magistrate Judge, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's supervised release is hereby REVOKED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for term of eighteen (18) months, with no supervised release to follow. The Court further recommends that Defendant's term of imprisonment be carried out in the Bureau of Prisons facilities located in Seagoville, Texas or Beaumont, Texas, if appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
