TOKASH v. FOXCO INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., 3:10-cv-872. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120515c43
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 14, 2012
Latest Update: May 14, 2012
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW, this 14 th day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Foxco Insurance Management Services, Inc. and Excalibur Insurance Management Services, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claims of discrimination on account of gender under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., and the PHRA (Counts II and IV of her Complaint) have been abandoned and are
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW, this 14 th day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Foxco Insurance Management Services, Inc. and Excalibur Insurance Management Services, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claims of discrimination on account of gender under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., and the PHRA (Counts II and IV of her Complaint) have been abandoned and are ..
More
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW, this 14th day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Foxco Insurance Management Services, Inc. and Excalibur Insurance Management Services, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED IN PART as follows:
1. Plaintiff's claims of discrimination on account of gender under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the PHRA (Counts II and IV of her Complaint) have been abandoned and are DISMISSED.
2. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.
Source: Leagle
