MAXWELL v. CLARKE, 13-7056. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130927137
Visitors: 23
Filed: Sep. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:12-cv-00477-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. June 13, 2013). We de
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:12-cv-00477-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. June 13, 2013). We den..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:12-cv-00477-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. June 13, 2013). We deny Maxwell's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
