United Financial Casualty Company v. Bush Architectural Excavating Corp., 2:19-cv-00327-JLR. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190605a98
Visitors: 34
Filed: May 22, 2019
Latest Update: May 22, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . I. STIPULATION Plaintiff United Financial Casualty Company (UFCC) and appearing defendants Daniel Gerard and David Demoor hereby stipulate and agree that good cause exists for the Court to extend the deadlines set in the Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement. Dkt. 11. The parties jointly ask that each of the deadlines be extended by thirty (30) days. The parties ask that th
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . I. STIPULATION Plaintiff United Financial Casualty Company (UFCC) and appearing defendants Daniel Gerard and David Demoor hereby stipulate and agree that good cause exists for the Court to extend the deadlines set in the Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement. Dkt. 11. The parties jointly ask that each of the deadlines be extended by thirty (30) days. The parties ask that the..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
I. STIPULATION
Plaintiff United Financial Casualty Company (UFCC) and appearing defendants Daniel Gerard and David Demoor hereby stipulate and agree that good cause exists for the Court to extend the deadlines set in the Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement. Dkt. 11. The parties jointly ask that each of the deadlines be extended by thirty (30) days. The parties ask that the Court modify the deadlines as follows:
Proposed Deadline
FRCP 26(f) Conference 6/21/2019
Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) 7/5/2019
Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery 7/12/2019
Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local
Civil Rule 26(f):
Good cause exists for the above-described extensions. First, Defendant David Demoor appeared and Answered for the first time on until May 20, 2019, two days before the deadline for the Deadline for the Rule 26(f) Conference. Dkt. at 18, 20. Second, The Bush1 Defendants have not appeared or answered, and a Default Order has been entered. Dkt. 14. A Motion for Default Judgment against the Bush Defendants is currently pending. Dkt. 15. The outcome of that motion will likely have a material effect on how the parties who have appeared wish to approach this case. Third, due to scheduling concerns, the parties who have appeared have not yet been able to identify any date before the current deadline that all counsel are available to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference.
As a result, the parties that have appeared in this action submit that good cause exists as to why the above-described deadlines should be extended.
DATED this 21st day of May, 2019.
II. ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendants Bush Architectural Esc. Co., Terry and Lori Bush, and James and "Jane Doe" Bush are referred to collectively as "Bush".
Source: Leagle