Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United Financial Casualty Company v. Bush Architectural Excavating Corp., 2:19-cv-00327-JLR. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190605a98 Visitors: 34
Filed: May 22, 2019
Latest Update: May 22, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . I. STIPULATION Plaintiff United Financial Casualty Company (UFCC) and appearing defendants Daniel Gerard and David Demoor hereby stipulate and agree that good cause exists for the Court to extend the deadlines set in the Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement. Dkt. 11. The parties jointly ask that each of the deadlines be extended by thirty (30) days. The parties ask that th
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES

I. STIPULATION

Plaintiff United Financial Casualty Company (UFCC) and appearing defendants Daniel Gerard and David Demoor hereby stipulate and agree that good cause exists for the Court to extend the deadlines set in the Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement. Dkt. 11. The parties jointly ask that each of the deadlines be extended by thirty (30) days. The parties ask that the Court modify the deadlines as follows:

Proposed Deadline FRCP 26(f) Conference 6/21/2019 Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) 7/5/2019 Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery 7/12/2019 Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 26(f):

Good cause exists for the above-described extensions. First, Defendant David Demoor appeared and Answered for the first time on until May 20, 2019, two days before the deadline for the Deadline for the Rule 26(f) Conference. Dkt. at 18, 20. Second, The Bush1 Defendants have not appeared or answered, and a Default Order has been entered. Dkt. 14. A Motion for Default Judgment against the Bush Defendants is currently pending. Dkt. 15. The outcome of that motion will likely have a material effect on how the parties who have appeared wish to approach this case. Third, due to scheduling concerns, the parties who have appeared have not yet been able to identify any date before the current deadline that all counsel are available to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference.

As a result, the parties that have appeared in this action submit that good cause exists as to why the above-described deadlines should be extended.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2019.

II. ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Defendants Bush Architectural Esc. Co., Terry and Lori Bush, and James and "Jane Doe" Bush are referred to collectively as "Bush".
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer