Filed: Mar. 19, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-19-2002 Lapid Laurel LLC v. Zoning Bd Adjustment Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 0-3625 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002 Recommended Citation "Lapid Laurel LLC v. Zoning Bd Adjustment" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 186. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/186 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by t
Summary: Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-19-2002 Lapid Laurel LLC v. Zoning Bd Adjustment Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 0-3625 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002 Recommended Citation "Lapid Laurel LLC v. Zoning Bd Adjustment" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 186. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/186 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by th..
More
Opinions of the United
2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
3-19-2002
Lapid Laurel LLC v. Zoning Bd Adjustment
Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Docket 0-3625
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002
Recommended Citation
"Lapid Laurel LLC v. Zoning Bd Adjustment" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 186.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/186
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2002 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 00-3625
____________________
LAPID-LAUREL, L.L.C.;
JOHN AND JANE DOE, Appellants
v.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF
THE TOWNSHIP OF SCOTCH PLAINS;
THE TOWNSHIP OF SCOTCH PLAINS;
ALTA A. ROSE; BARBARA HOREV
(D.C. Civ. No. 99-cv-02461)
_________________________________________
Argued: September 7, 2001
Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, ALITO and BARRY,
Circuit Judges.
(Opinion filed March 15, 2002)
____________________________
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
____________________________
The slip opinion in the above case filed March 15, 2002 is hereby
amended as
follows:
1. On page 19, line 19, the word Mengine should be italicized.
2. On page 20, line 10, delete "at 233" after
Id.
3. On page 29, next to the last line of footnote 8, delete the comma
after the word
"accommodations."
4. On page 33, line 8, drop the "s" in the word requires, and add
the word "would"
before the word "require."
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward R. Becker
Chief Judge
DATED: March 19, 2002
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 18, 2002
TO: Carolyn Hicks, Case Manager
FROM: Judge Becker
RE: Lapid-Laurel v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
No. 00-3625
Opinion filed March 15, 2002
Please file enclosed Unpublished Order Amending Opinion in the above
captioned case.
Sincerely,
Edward R. Becker
ERB:afr
cc: Judge Alito
Judge Barry
Marcy Waldron
Trish Coleman