Lyons v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 4:17-CV-1635. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20180919676
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION ANDREW S. HANEN , District Judge . Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. #11), and Magistrate Judge Stacy's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. #15) that the Court grant the Movant's motion. Plaintiff Larry E. Lyons neither responded to the motion to dismiss nor did he object to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Thus, under Local Rule 7.
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION ANDREW S. HANEN , District Judge . Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. #11), and Magistrate Judge Stacy's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. #15) that the Court grant the Movant's motion. Plaintiff Larry E. Lyons neither responded to the motion to dismiss nor did he object to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Thus, under Local Rule 7.4..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
ANDREW S. HANEN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. #11), and Magistrate Judge Stacy's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. #15) that the Court grant the Movant's motion. Plaintiff Larry E. Lyons neither responded to the motion to dismiss nor did he object to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Thus, under Local Rule 7.4, the motion and memorandum are deemed unopposed.
Upon review, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that Lyons failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted, Accordingly, the Court hereby
ORDERS that the Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. 15) ADOPTED. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Entry of this Order shall constitute entry of final judgment.
Source: Leagle
