Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. POOLE, 6:11CR50. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20120119b24 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of Defendant's motion to suppress has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the Motion to Suppress (document #20) be denied. Defendant filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation on Januar
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of Defendant's motion to suppress has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the Motion to Suppress (document #20) be denied. Defendant filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation on January 9, 2012.

Having made a de novo review of the written objections filed by Defendant, the Court finds that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit. The Court, therefore, adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court.

In light of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Motion to Suppress (document #20) is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer