Burts v. Berryhill, C18-5010 RAJ. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180808e93
Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 41(b), filed July 11, 2018, and noted for August 3, 2018. Dkt. 17. The Scheduling Order required Plaintiff to file his opening brief by July 5, 2018. Dkt. 16. Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief, has not filed any response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and has not requested any extension of time. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 41(b), filed July 11, 2018, and noted for August 3, 2018. Dkt. 17. The Scheduling Order required Plaintiff to file his opening brief by July 5, 2018. Dkt. 16. Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief, has not filed any response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and has not requested any extension of time. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion...
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 41(b), filed July 11, 2018, and noted for August 3, 2018. Dkt. 17. The Scheduling Order required Plaintiff to file his opening brief by July 5, 2018. Dkt. 16. Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief, has not filed any response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and has not requested any extension of time. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion.
It is hereby ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. This dismissal is without prejudice for Plaintiff to re-file the matter within the proper statutory limitations.
Source: Leagle