NEWMAN v. GENERAL SERVICES CORPORATION, 12-1707. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120913114
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Helen C. Newman and Maria A. Newman appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Newman v. Gen. Servs. Corp., No. 3:11-cv-00783-REP (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012). We dispense with or
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Helen C. Newman and Maria A. Newman appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Newman v. Gen. Servs. Corp., No. 3:11-cv-00783-REP (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012). We dispense with ora..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Helen C. Newman and Maria A. Newman appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Newman v. Gen. Servs. Corp., No. 3:11-cv-00783-REP (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle