U.S. v. PHILLIPS, 13-6732. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130827132
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Nattaner Phillips appeals the district court's order dismissing his motion to appoint counsel to aid in the preparation of a 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion to set aside, vacate, or correct his federal sentence. We have reviewed the record and conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the requested relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. * See Un
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Nattaner Phillips appeals the district court's order dismissing his motion to appoint counsel to aid in the preparation of a 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion to set aside, vacate, or correct his federal sentence. We have reviewed the record and conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the requested relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. * See Uni..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Nattaner Phillips appeals the district court's order dismissing his motion to appoint counsel to aid in the preparation of a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion to set aside, vacate, or correct his federal sentence. We have reviewed the record and conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the requested relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.* See United States v. Phillips, No. 2:09-cr-00031-AWA-FBS-5 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 8, 2013 & entered Apr. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
FootNotes
* We note that the district court did not explicitly construe Phillips' motion to appoint counsel as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion or provide notice of its intent to so construe the motion. See Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 377 (2003). Accordingly, Phillips remains free to file a § 2255 motion in the district court.
Source: Leagle
