Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ORTIZ-FISHER v. COLVIN, 3:13-cv-1168. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20150519c12 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 18, 2015
Latest Update: May 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP , District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 21), recommending that the Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 16) filed by Plaintiff Yvonne Ortiz-Fisher be denied and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. No objections were made to the R & R. Where no objections are made to the R & R, "[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; rec
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 21), recommending that the Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 16) filed by Plaintiff Yvonne Ortiz-Fisher be denied and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. No objections were made to the R & R.

Where no objections are made to the R & R, "[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." FED R. CIV. P. 72(b).

Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:

(1) The R & R (Docket No. 21) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 16) is hereby DENIED and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

It is SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer