Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Little v. Berryhill, C17-5474-RBL-JPD. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20171116g71 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2017
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JAMES P. DONOHUE , Chief Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon the Commissioner's unopposed motion to remand this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence six of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Dkt. 19. 1 In sentence-six remands, the court retains jurisdiction over the action pending further administrative development of the record. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 , 299 (1993). Here, although the ALJ c
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court upon the Commissioner's unopposed motion to remand this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence six of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Dkt. 19.1 In sentence-six remands, the court retains jurisdiction over the action pending further administrative development of the record. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 299 (1993). Here, although the ALJ cited to evidence within the administrative record ("AR") to support his decision, the AR contained personally identifiable information of another person's records mixed into plaintiff's records, which the ALJ used to support his decision. Dkt. 13 at 2. It is therefore unclear if the records cited by the ALJ related to plaintiff, or to another person. Id. As a result, the Commissioner asks the Court to remand the case under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the ALJ to conduct a de novo hearing. Id. at 2. On November 7, 2017, plaintiff indicated that he has no objection, and that he consents to the Commissioner's motion for a sentence six remand. Dkt. 14.

Accordingly, the Court recommends that the Commissioner's unopposed motion for a sentence six remand, Dkt. 13, be GRANTED. This case should be REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a de novo hearing. If the outcome of the de novo hearing is unfavorable to plaintiff, he may seek judicial review by reinstating this case rather than by filing a new complaint. If the outcome is favorable to plaintiff, the parties shall move the Court for entry of judgment.

Because the parties have agreed that the case be remanded as set forth above, the Court recommends that United States District Judge Ronald B. Leighton immediately approve this Report and Recommendation. The Clerk should note the matter for November 14, 2017 as ready for Judge Leighton's consideration. A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.

ORDER REMANDING CASE PURSUANT TO SENTENCE SIX

The Court, after careful consideration of the plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts and approves the Report and Recommendation.

(2) This case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

(3) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge Donohue.

FootNotes


1. Sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) provides that "the court may, on motion of the Commissioner made for good cause shown before he files his answer, remand the case to the Commissioner for further action by the Commissioner of Social Security. . . ."
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer