Fields v. City of Sherman, 4:18-CV-821. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20200123g21
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On December 5, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #57) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Office of the Attorney General for the S
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On December 5, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #57) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Office of the Attorney General for the St..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AMOS L. MAZZANT, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 5, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #57) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #44) be granted and each of Plaintiff's claims as to the Attorney General for the State of Texas be dismissed with prejudice.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #44) is GRANTED, and each of Plaintiff's claims as to the Attorney General for the State of Texas are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
