RYAN v. MILLER-STOUT, C12-727 JCC-BAT. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20151214a94
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Samuel Ryan filed a federal habeas corpus petition in May 2012. Dkt. 6. On June 27, 2012 this Court granted Mr. Ryan's second request for stay and directed filing of status reports every ninety days. Dkt. 19 and 20. On November 30, 2015, Mr. Ryan informed the Court that his state court proceedings are now complete and he requests the Court lift the stay and grant him a sixty day extension to file his petition and me
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Samuel Ryan filed a federal habeas corpus petition in May 2012. Dkt. 6. On June 27, 2012 this Court granted Mr. Ryan's second request for stay and directed filing of status reports every ninety days. Dkt. 19 and 20. On November 30, 2015, Mr. Ryan informed the Court that his state court proceedings are now complete and he requests the Court lift the stay and grant him a sixty day extension to file his petition and mem..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner Samuel Ryan filed a federal habeas corpus petition in May 2012. Dkt. 6. On June 27, 2012 this Court granted Mr. Ryan's second request for stay and directed filing of status reports every ninety days. Dkt. 19 and 20. On November 30, 2015, Mr. Ryan informed the Court that his state court proceedings are now complete and he requests the Court lift the stay and grant him a sixty day extension to file his petition and memorandum. Dkt. 57 and 58. Respondent has no objection to the requested extension. Dkt. 60.
The Court recommends GRANTING petitioner's unopposed motion to lift the stay and for an extension of time (Dkt. 57 and 58). The Court also recommends the following briefing schedule: (1) petitioner to file a memorandum in support of his habeas petition by February 16, 2016; (2) respondent to file and serve an answer to the petition by March 28, 2016; (3) petitioner to file a reply, if any, by April 1, 2016; and (4) the petition noted as ready for the Court's consideration on April 1, 2016.
As respondent does not oppose the motion, the Court recommends if this recommendation is adopted, that it be approved immediately. A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.
Source: Leagle
