U.S. v. BRANCH, 12-6301. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120802105
Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Branch appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Branch, No. 4:01-cr-00061-HCM-1 (E.D. Va., Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Branch appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Branch, No. 4:01-cr-00061-HCM-1 (E.D. Va., Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Branch appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Branch, No. 4:01-cr-00061-HCM-1 (E.D. Va., Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
