ROOT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 13-5584. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150605c94
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2015, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, there being no objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED without prejudice a
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2015, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, there being no objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED without prejudice an..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2015, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, there being no objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED without prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing.
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED for all purposes.
Source: Leagle
